![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() Info Archive |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
[ Donate : Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund Save The Rhino ] <Prev Subject: Re: Actually, Mad Statistician... ( 11 of 11 ) Posted by The Bad Statistician I find both your methods rather disturbing. I mean word count?! Really!! Let's look at the pixel count, the real measure of volume distribution in an internet post. Using Mad's original position of separating into only the 2 stated categories -- disclaimer and question -- we find exactly 7568 pixels dedicated to the disclaimer, and 3737 pixels in the question section (I have excluded the sign-off), for a total pixel count of 11305. This gives us the following results: Disclaimer ---- 66.94383016364% Question ---- 33.05616983636% So there! <Prev
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|