![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() ![]() |
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() Info Archive |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
[ Donate : Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund Save The Rhino ] <Prev Next> Subject: Re: religious tendencies ( 6 of 47 ) Posted by abde The perception that religious people cannot explain their faith to atheists s built on a false premise. What is true is that religious people cannot relate their religious experiences to atheists in a manner that atheists can fully understand. Inevitably, any discussion of belief will fall to concepts that have no logical proof - this is not a flaw in an "argument" but simply a fact. I referred to Godel's Theorem earlier - in a nutshell, Godel (arguably in the same intellectual league as Feynman) proved that for any rules-based system (like physics, math, logic itself) there are certain statements that are neither provably true nor provably false. There is a fundamental limit to how far simple logic can get you, and not all phenomena that are physically possible can neccessarily be deduced from 1st principles. I am not arguing that God is defined in this way - far from it - but I am pointing out that what a religious person feels yet cannot communicate to a skeptic need not be founded on logic to be valid. For an excellent intro to Godel, check out this math project on the web by a high scool student - easy reading and well-done: http://www.clarku.edu/~hmarek/html/godel.html the more you think about Godel's Theorem, the more liberated you will feel, paradoxically. Poor Mr. Spock! <Prev Next>
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|